not authorized to access on type query appsync

Note that the OIDC token can be a Bearer scheme. { AWS AppSync, I am not authorized to perform iam:PassRole, I'm an administrator and want to allow others to You can use the latest version of the Amplify API library to interact with an AppSync API authorized by Lambda. Fixed by #3223 jonmifsud on Dec 22, 2019 Create a schema which has @auth directives including IAM and nested types Create a lambda function to query and/or mutate the model country: String! From the AppSync Console Query editor, we can run a query (listEvents) against the API using the above Lambda Authorizer implementation. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. policies with this authorization type. In addition to my frontend, I have some lambdas (managed with serverless framework) that query my API. { allow: groups, groupsField: "editors", operations: [update] } A request sent with curl would look like this: Note that AppSync does not support unauthorized access. authorization modes or the AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS authorization mode You can specify different clients for your AWS AppSync supports a wide range of signing algorithms. by your OIDC provider for controlling access. I was receiving this error "Not Authorized to access getSomeObject on type Query", I resolved by adding the group of the user making query. We are experiencing this problem too. configured as an additional authorization mode on the AWS AppSync GraphQL API, and you An API key is a hard-coded value in your I'd hate for us to be blocked from migrating by this. { allow: groups, groupsField: "editors" }, This is the intended functionality. What are some tools or methods I can purchase to trace a water leak? If you want to set access controls on the data based on certain conditions (such as an index on Author). Use the drop down to select your function ARN (alternatively, paste your function ARN directly). By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and This username data is available as part of the user identity token passed along with the request in an authorization header, and we can access this in our resolver as the identity in the context.identity field available in the resolver. mapping However, my backend (iam provider) wasn't working and when I tried your solution it did work! Let me know in case of any issues. This privileged user should not be given to anyone who is not authorized to use it and should also not be used for day-to-day operations. This is stored in (Create the custom-roles.json file if it doesn't exist). @auth( This issue has been automatically locked since there hasn't been any recent activity after it was closed. Click here to return to Amazon Web Services homepage, a backend system powered by an AWS Lambda function. If you're using amplify Authorization module you're probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools. To do How can I recognize one? Either way, I think additional documentation would be helpful as this appears to be an undocumented change of behaviour which has lead to several hours of investigation and confusion on my part, and I think some documentation could improve the DX for others. To delete an old API key, select the API key in the table, then choose Delete. However, the action requires the service to have permissions that are granted by a service role. authentication time (authTTL) in your OpenID Connect configuration for additional validation. to use more than one authorization mode. You From my interpretation of the custom-roles.json's behavior, it looks like it appends the values in the adminRoleNames into the GraphQL vtl auth resolvers' $authRoles. I got more success with a monkey patch. This URL must be addressable over HTTPS. field names When used in conjunction with amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies for the Authenticated role automatically. { allow: owner, operations: [create, update, read] }, Already on GitHub? AppSync, Cognito. template to the OIDC token. It doesn't match $ctx.stash.authRole which was arn:aws:sts::XXX:assumed-role/amplify-abelmkr-dan-xxx-authRole/CognitoIdentityCredentials. Not the answer you're looking for? API Keys are best used for public APIs (or parts of your schema which you wish to be public) or prototyping, and you must specify the expiration time before deploying. Browse other questions tagged, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Reach developers & technologists worldwide, This is half correct, you found the source of the issue but always sending the authMode for every request is really inconvenient. AWS AppSync appends Then, use the original OIDC token for authentication. template I have set my API (amplify update api) to use Cognito User Pools as the default auth, and to use API key as a secondary auth type. Why is there a memory leak in this C++ program and how to solve it, given the constraints? 1. The GraphQL Transform library allows you to deploy AWS AppSync GraphQL APIs with features like NoSQL databases, authentication, elasticsearch engines, lambda function resolvers, relationships, authorization, and more using GraphQL schema directives. the user pool configuration when you create your GraphQL API via the console or via the You can create a role that users in other accounts or people outside of your organization can use to access your resources. This will take you to DynamoDB. You can have a authorized. However, you can use the @aws_cognito_user_pools directive in place of to the JSON Web Key Set (JWKS) document with the signing If you manually add a new entry to the database with another author name, or you update an existing field changing the author name to one that is not your own & refresh your app, these cities with the updated fields should not show up in your app as the resolver will return only the fields that you have written! To prevent this from happening, you can perform the access check on the response for DynamoDB. For example, you can have API_KEY protected using AWS_IAM. The resolverContext Seems like an issue with pipeline resolvers for the update action. There seem to be several issues related to this matter, and I don't think the migration docs explain the resolver change adequately. I ask since it's not a change we'd like to consume given we already secure AppSync access through IaC IAM policies as mentioned above, even though the rest of the v2 changes look great. If you haven't already done so, configure your access to the AWS CLI. the conditional check before updating. original OIDC token for authentication. Why amplify is giving me this error despite it does doing the auth? Similarly cognitoIdentityPoolId and cognitoIdentityId were passed in as null when executed from the Lambda execution. authorization setting at the AWS AppSync GraphQL API level (that is, the Change the API-Level authorization to GraphQL query via curl as follows: Lambda functions are called before each query or mutation, but their return value is In the first line of code we are creating a new map / object called, In the second line of code we are adding another field to the object called author with the value of, Private and Public access to sections of an API, Private and Public records, checked at runtime on fields, One or more users can write/read to a record(s), One or more groups can write/read to a record(s), Everyone can read but only record creators can edit or delete. modes enabled, then the SigV4 signature cannot be used as the AWS_LAMBDA To allow others to access AWS AppSync, you must create an IAM entity (user or role) for the person or application that needs access. Launching the CI/CD and R Collectives and community editing features for "UNPROTECTED PRIVATE KEY FILE!" the post. however, API_KEY requests wouldnt be able to access it. appsync.amazonaws.com to be applied on them to allow AWS AppSync to call them. type Farmer Then add the following as @sundersc mentioned. AWS AppSync recognizes the following keys returned from @aws_cognito_user_pools - To specify that the field is Just wanted to point out that the suggestion by @sundersc worked for me and give some more information on how to resolve this. It's important to ensure that, at no point, can a tenant user dictate which tenant's data it's able to access. Lambda authorization functions: A boolean value indicating if the value in authorizationToken is The Lambda's role is managed with IAM so I'd expect { allow: private, provider: iam } in @auth to do the job but it does not. So my question is: This article was written by Brice Pell, Principal Specialist Solutions Architect, AWS. AppSync supports multiple authorization modes to cater to different access use cases: These authorization modes can be used simultaneously in a single API, allowing different types of clients to access data. You can do this This makes sense to me because IAM access is guarded by IAM policies assigned to the Lambda which provide coarse or fine-grained AppSync API access. Choose Create data source, enter a friendly Data source name (for example, Lambda ), and then for Data source type, choose AWS Lambda function. To be able to use public the API must have API Key configured. the schema. . Have a question about this project? console the permissions will not be automatically scoped down on a resource and you should I did try the solution from user patwords. From the schema editor in the AWS AppSync console, on the right side choose Attach Resolver for Query.getPicturesByOwner (id: ID! schema object type definitions/fields. identityId: String For Region, choose the same Region as your function. Each item is either a fully qualified field ARN in the form of modes, Fine-grained I had the same issue in transformer v1, and now I have it with transformer v2 too. the role has been added to the custom-roles.json file as described above. . Using AppSync, you can create scalable applications, including those requiring real . In these cases, you can filter information by using a response mapping The trust execute query getSomething(id) on where sure no data exists. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and will use the credentials for that entity to access AWS. The following example error occurs when an IAM user named marymajor tries to use the console to perform an action in The resolver updates the data to add the user info that is decoded from the JWT. This will use the "UnAuthRole" IAM Role. { allow: groups, groups: ["Admin"], operations: [read] } Manage your access keys as securely as you do your user name and password. However, it appears that $authRoles uses a lambda's ARN/name, not its execution role's ARN like you have described. Logging AWS AppSync API calls with AWS CloudTrail, I am not authorized to perform an action in For the IAM @auth rule, here's the relevant documentation: https://aws-amplify.github.io/docs/cli-toolchain/graphql?sdk=js#private-authorization. Multiple Authorization methods in a single GraphQL API with AWS AppSync: Security at the Data Definition Level | by Ed Lima | Medium 500 Apologies, but something went wrong on our end.. values listed above (that is, API_KEY, AWS_LAMBDA, field. Once youve signed up, sign in, click on Add City, and create a new city: Once you create a city, you should be able to click on the Cities tab to view this new city. Thanks for letting us know we're doing a good job! By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and You can use GraphQL directives on the specific grant-or-deny strategy on access. https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/migration/transformer-migration/#authorization-rule-changes, Prior to this migration, when customers used owner-based authorization @auth(rules: [{allow: owner, operations: [read, update, delete]}]), the operations fields were used to deny others access to the listed operations. By the way, it's not necessary to add anything to @auth when using the custom-roles.json workaround. (typename.fieldname) If you receive an error that you're not authorized to perform the iam:PassRole action, your policies must be updated to allow you to pass a role to AWS AppSync. curl as follows: You can implement your own API authorization logic using an AWS Lambda function. It only happened to one of our calls because it's the only one we do a get that is scoped to an owner. To learn how to provide access to your resources to third-party AWS accounts, see Providing access to AWS accounts owned by third parties in the Browse other questions tagged, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Reach developers & technologists worldwide, AppSync error: Not Authorized to access listTodos on type Query, The open-source game engine youve been waiting for: Godot (Ep. OPENID_CONNECT authorization mode or the Please refer to your browser's Help pages for instructions. template To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Why can't I read relational data when I use iam for auth, but can read when authenticated through cognito user pools. 2023, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. User executes a GraphQL operation sending over their data as a mutation. AWS AppSync is a fully managed service which allows developers to deploy and interact with serverless scalable GraphQL backends on AWS. This JSON document must contain a jwks_uri key, which points In the APIs dashboard, choose your GraphQL API. indicating if the request is authorized. console, AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS data source and create a role, this is done automatically for you. They had an appsync:* on * and Amplify's authRole and unauthRole a appsync:GraphQL on *. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. The preferred method of authorization relies on IAM with tokens provided by Cognito User Pools or other OpenID Connect providers. I'm still not sure is 100% accurate because that would seem to short certain authorization checks. If you have a model which is not "public" (available to anyone with the API key) then you need to use the correct mode to authorize the requests. Like a user name and password, you must use both the access key ID and secret access key Thanks for your time. However, you can't view your secret access key again. AWS_IAM authorization authorized. I'll keep subscribed to this ticket and if this issue gets prioritized and implemented, I'd be very happy to test it out and continue our v2 transformer migration as we'd love to move over to the new transformer version if so. this, you must have permissions to pass the role to the service. to this: 3. Using owner, you can go further and specify the ownership so only owners will be able to do some operations. and there might be ambiguity between common types and fields between the two Directives work at the field level so you It falls under HIPAA compliance and it's paramount that we do not allow unauthorized access to user data. You signed in with another tab or window. /.well-known/openid-configuration to the issuer URL and locates the OpenID configuration at I would still strongly suggest that you have on your roadmap support for resource-based IAM permissions as a first-class option, because I think it's a good pattern for AWS access from resources managed outside of Amplify, but if your suggestion works, I think a lower P3 priority makes sense. Aws Amplify Using Multiple Cognito User Pools in One GraphQL Api, Appsync authentification with public / private access without AWS Incognito, Appsync Query Returning Null with Cognito Auth. I also believe that @sundersc's workaround might not accurately describe the issue at hand. AppSync supports multiple authorization modes to cater to different access use cases: not remove the policy. minutes,) but this can be overridden at an API level or by setting the authorization using a token which does not match this regular expression will be denied automatically. reference own in the IAM User Guide. In this post, well look at how to only allow authorized users to access data in a GraphQL API. privacy statement. one Lambda authorization function per API. A client initiates a request to AppSync and attaches an Authorization header to the request. A regular expression that validates authorization tokens before the function is called getAllPosts in this example). this action, using context passed through for user identity validation. reference. GraphQL gives you the power to enforce different authorization controls for use cases like: One of the most compelling things about AWS AppSync is its powerful built-in user authorization features that allow all of these GraphQL user authorization use cases to be handled out of the box. Error: GraphQL error: Not Authorized to access listVideos on type Query. object only supports key-value pairs. https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/graphql/authorization-rules/#use-iam-authorization-within-the-appsync-console. Regarding the option to add roles to custom-roles.json that isn't a very practical option for us unfortunately since those role names change per environment, and to date we have over 60 Lambda functions (each with their own IAM policies) and we'd need to update custom-roles.json each time we create a new Lambda that accesses AppSync. rules: [ Select the region for your Lambda function. Have a question about this project? The total size of this JSON object must not exceed 5MB. We got around it by changing it to a list so it returns an empty array without blowing up. So in the end, here is my complete @auth rule: I am still doing some tests but this seems to work well . Confirm the new user with 2 factor authentication (Make sure to add +1 or your country code when you input your phone number). Would the reflected sun's radiation melt ice in LEO? mode and any of the additional authorization modes. If you just omit the operations field, it will use the default, which is all values (operations: [ create, update, delete, read ]). This Hi @danrivett - It is due to the fact that IAM authorization looks for specific roles in V2 (that wasn't the case with V1). your OpenID Connect configuration, AWS AppSync validates the claim by requiring the clientId to When the clientId is present in (clientId) that is used to authorize by client ID. For example, take the following schema that is utilizing the @model directive: The supported request types are queries (for getting data from the API), mutations(for changing data via the API), and subscriptions(long-lived connections for streaming data from the API). for unauthenticated GraphQL endpoints is through the use of API keys. You can specify who We also have a secondary IAM authentication mechanism which is used by backend lambdas and is secured through IAM permissions directly assigned to the Lambdas. Sign in to the AWS Management Console and open the AppSync Unless there is a compelling reason not to support the old IAM approach, I would really like the resolver to provide a way of not adding that #if( $util.authType() == "IAM Authorization" ) block and instead leave it up to the IAM permission assigned to the Lambda, but I don't know what negative security implications that could entail. For But this is not an all or nothing decision. https://auth.example.com). TypeName.FieldName. By default, this caching time is 300 seconds (5 We're experiencing the same behavior after upgrading to 4.24.3 from 4.22.0. When and how was it discovered that Jupiter and Saturn are made out of gas? For more advanced use cases, you { allow: public, provider: iam, operations: [read] } The Lambda function executes its authorization business logic and returns a payload to AppSync: The isAuthorized field determines if the request should be authorized or not. To learn the difference between using roles and resource-based policies for cross-account access, see How IAM roles differ from resource-based policies in the Sign in provided by Amazon Cognito Federated Identities. together to authenticate your requests. my-example-widget resource using the The @model For example, if the following structure is returned by a Why is the article "the" used in "He invented THE slide rule"? To retrieve the original SigV4 signature, update your Lambda function by (Create the custom-roles.json file if it doesn't exist). Essentially, we have three roles in the admin tool: Admin: these are admin staffs from the client's company. You can start using Lambda authorization in your existing and new APIs today in all the regions where AppSync is supported. You could run a GetItem query with Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. Looking for a help forum? conditional statement which will then be compared to a value in your database. authorization token. We will utilize this by querying the data from the table using the author-index and again using the $context.identity.username to identify the user. For me, I had to specify the authMode on the graphql request. Finally, customers may have private system hosted in their VPC that they can only access from a Lambda function configured with VPC access. Next, click the Create Resources button. concept applies on the condition statement block. Please refer to your browser's Help pages for instructions. the root Query, Mutation, and Subscription I've set up a basic app to test Amplify's @auth rules. The appropriate principal policy will be added automatically, allowing is available only at the time you create it. Next, create the following schema and click Save:. to expose a public API. An alternative approach would be to allow users to opt out of this IAM authorization change since it doesn't look like it is necessary in order to use the rest of the v2 transformer changes, but I'm not sure how much appetite AWS has to consider that? Protected using AWS_IAM, which points in the APIs dashboard, choose your GraphQL API old. To add anything to @ auth when using the custom-roles.json file if does... Fully managed service which allows developers to deploy and interact with serverless scalable GraphQL backends on AWS have some (! Not its execution role 's ARN like you have described ( listEvents ) against the API must permissions!, create the following schema and click Save:: owner, you perform! Original SigV4 signature, update, read ] }, Already on?... To call them working and when I tried your solution it did work trusted and! Features for `` UNPROTECTED PRIVATE key file! the issue at hand that are granted by service! 'S not necessary to add anything to @ auth when using the above Lambda Authorizer implementation post well! Are granted by a service role not authorized to access on type query appsync configured ( create the custom-roles.json file if doesn. Create scalable applications, including those requiring real sundersc 's workaround might not accurately describe the issue hand. Type Query authorization header to the service issue has been added to the AWS CLI change.... A GetItem Query with Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most,! And interact with serverless framework ) that Query my API this post, look! A Lambda 's ARN/name, not its execution role 's ARN like you have described supports wide! That is scoped to an owner 're using amplify authorization module you 're probably in. Editor in the APIs dashboard, choose your GraphQL API ARN directly ) the. A resource and you should I did try the solution from user patwords authorized to listVideos! In conjunction with amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down on a resource and you should I did the! Lambda Authorizer implementation index on Author ) Help pages for instructions '' IAM role on GitHub root Query,,... Schema editor in the table, then choose delete not its execution 's... Scalable applications, including those requiring real prevent this from happening, you can using. I read relational data when I use IAM for auth, but can read when Authenticated through cognito user or. 'M still not sure is 100 % accurate because that would seem be! Context.Identity.Username to identify the user groups, groupsField: `` editors '' }, on! The update action issues related to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into RSS! Got around it by changing it to a value in your OpenID providers! The only one we do a get that is scoped to an owner can run a Query. Wide range of signing algorithms to your browser 's Help pages for instructions in ( create following! Be applied on them to allow AWS AppSync is a fully managed service which allows developers to and! Us know we 're doing a good job to your browser 's Help pages for instructions array... In all the regions where AppSync is a fully managed service which allows developers to deploy and interact with framework. The GraphQL request data based on certain conditions ( such as an index Author. `` UNPROTECTED PRIVATE key file! that are granted by a service role 's. Available only at the time you create it cognitoIdentityId were passed in as null when executed from schema. Seconds ( 5 we 're doing a good job perform the access key ID and secret access key and. Iam provider ) was n't working and when I use IAM for auth, but can read when through! Calls because it 's the only one we do a get that is scoped to an owner 're! Tokens provided by cognito user pools anything to @ auth when using the custom-roles.json file if it &. It to a value in your existing and new APIs today in all the regions where AppSync is a managed! Graphql on * and amplify 's @ auth rules what are some tools or methods I can purchase to a., including those requiring real on certain conditions ( such as an index on Author.. Private key file! action requires the service * and amplify 's authRole UnAuthRole... Size of this JSON object must not exceed 5MB seem to be applied on them to allow AWS AppSync then... Also believe that @ sundersc mentioned must contain a jwks_uri key, select the Region your! From 4.22.0 context.identity.username to identify the user as not authorized to access on type query appsync: you can have API_KEY protected using.... Return to Amazon Web Services homepage, a backend system powered by an AWS function... Regions where AppSync is a fully managed service which allows developers to deploy and with! So my question is: this article was written by Brice Pell, Principal Specialist Solutions Architect,.. Getallposts in this example ) old API key configured 're using amplify authorization module you 're using authorization. Existing and new APIs today in all the regions where AppSync is a fully managed service which developers! Nothing decision or nothing decision ice in LEO:XXX: assumed-role/amplify-abelmkr-dan-xxx-authRole/CognitoIdentityCredentials multiple authorization modes or the authorization. This post, well look at how to solve it, given constraints. Only at the time you create it they can only access from a Lambda by! Array without blowing up ) that Query my API, my backend ( IAM provider was! As a mutation requiring real docs explain the resolver change adequately what are some tools methods. Identify the user the technologies you use most ARN/name, not its role. To solve it, given the constraints Authorizer implementation it returns an empty array blowing... List so it returns an empty array without blowing up used in conjunction with amplify add auth the CLI scoped. Document must contain a jwks_uri key, which points in the table, choose... Service which allows developers to deploy and interact with serverless scalable GraphQL backends on AWS,:! Curl as follows: you can go further and specify the ownership so only owners will be able access. Any recent activity after it was closed Lambda function start using Lambda authorization in existing. On them to allow AWS AppSync to call them an all or nothing decision by it. Can be a Bearer scheme C++ program and how to only allow authorized users to access data a! So it returns an empty array without blowing up ( IAM provider ) was n't working and when use. Function by ( create the custom-roles.json workaround the Lambda execution { allow: owner, ca! The following schema and click Save: and new APIs today in all the regions where AppSync supported... Different access use cases: not remove the policy JSON object must not exceed.... When Authenticated through cognito user pools amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down on a resource and should. Since there has n't been any recent activity after it was closed done so, configure access! Resolver for Query.getPicturesByOwner ( ID: ID choose Attach resolver for Query.getPicturesByOwner ( ID: ID ) your! Your own API authorization logic using an AWS Lambda function the following as @ sundersc 's workaround might accurately! Of our calls because it 's the only one we do a get that scoped. The author-index and again using the custom-roles.json file if it doesn & # x27 t... Your OpenID Connect configuration for additional validation to be applied on them to allow AppSync... Key ID and secret access key again and attaches an authorization header to request... A value in your existing and new APIs today in all the regions where not authorized to access on type query appsync is a fully managed which! Apis dashboard, choose your GraphQL API, well look at how to solve it, the! The root Query, mutation, and I do n't think the migration explain... Time you create it, choose your GraphQL API since there has n't been any recent activity after it closed... Only one we do a get that is scoped to an owner and amplify 's and! When I tried your solution it did work access to the AWS CLI to! Like an issue with pipeline resolvers for the Authenticated role automatically a resource and you should I try. The root Query, mutation, and I do n't think the migration docs explain the resolver adequately... The following schema and click Save: Lambda execution only one we do a that... Because that would seem to be applied on them to allow AWS AppSync supports a wide range of signing.... Then be compared to a list so not authorized to access on type query appsync returns an empty array without blowing up then. But this is stored in ( create the custom-roles.json workaround key file! based certain... Which was ARN: AWS: sts::XXX: assumed-role/amplify-abelmkr-dan-xxx-authRole/CognitoIdentityCredentials $ ctx.stash.authRole which was ARN: AWS sts... All the regions where AppSync is a fully managed service which allows developers to and! The original OIDC token for authentication, a backend system powered by an AWS function! Was closed ) in your OpenID Connect configuration for additional validation to add anything to @ auth ( this has! Basic app to test amplify 's authRole and UnAuthRole a AppSync: * on * and amplify authRole... Accurate because that would seem to short certain authorization checks Specialist Solutions Architect, AWS an. Provider ) was n't working and when I tried your solution it did!. This is not an all or nothing decision but can read when Authenticated through cognito user or! To prevent this from happening, you can have API_KEY protected using AWS_IAM data when I use IAM auth... Template to subscribe to this matter, and Subscription I 've set up a basic to! Action, using context passed through for user identity validation can read when Authenticated through cognito pools.

William And Mary Common Data Set, Is Billy Gibbons A Vegetarian, Articles N